Choose timezone
Your profile timezone:
Powered by Indico
v3.3.5
The Interest JINR student program will run until December 15. I hope you are aware that you will need to upload the report to the website. I suggest leaving this matter until the last week. In other words, we have 2 weeks left to achieve some results. Unfortunately, progress has been limited in some directions. Let's mobilize. The task is more or less the same for everyone - to implement the comparison section in the article, presumably in tabular form. We needed to define a list of comparable parameters based on theory, with the foundation ideally rooted in international standards. Additionally, we need to find quantitative and qualitative indicators in existing documentation and articles on the projects. I am looking forward to your ideas on the formatting.
Group 1:
Abdelrhman:
Nour:
You're on the right track. Interesting data has been presented. However, operational statistics for LHC are beyond the scope of our comparison topic. Try to find global standards related to your topic, serving as the basis for our comparison. Also, work on structuring the decomposition of the term "work organization." I've provided some assistance on this matter.
Group 2:
Sancia:
a few new standards for you. But it seems you may have misunderstood the previous task a bit. We are attempting to compare two automated systems, and to do that, we need to determine what aspects to compare them on. We require a basis for comparison, and this could be some universally accepted concepts found in global standards. I asked you to familiarize yourself with the standards and try to identify key concepts, metrics, and potential parameters for comparison. But in your last presentation, I didn't find such information. In any case, it was only part of the task. If you encounter difficulties with a particular assignment, you can switch to another one, and feel free to ask clarifying questions in the chat; it will be easier for me to respond to them than during a meeting.
Alaa:
In your previous presentation, you provided a large amount of information (26 slides), but not all of it pertains to DCS. In the future, try to condense and focus on the essentials, limiting to 5-10 slides. Please include a summary at the end of the presentation, indicating what information was found on which positions and what parameters for comparison were proposed. I remind you that we have 15 subdetectors, as well as various internal and external subsystems. We need to find the necessary information on the ACS TP provision for each of them. Plan your time wisely.