Choose timezone
Your profile timezone:
SCIENCE BRINGS NATIONS TOGETHER
Control Systems Survey
→
Europe/Moscow
109 (201)
109
201
Description
I want to remind you once again to upload your presentation materials in advance to the platform you plan to use for reporting results. Presentation requirements remain the same: a moderate number of slides, substantive content, not just plain text. I would like to see a list of "comparison parameters," presented in a structured manner.
Group 1:
Abdelrhman:
We are still awaiting the decomposition into sections for the concept of "work environment." In the presented tables, transition to a two-column format: NICA and LHC. There is no need to break down the NICA column into sub-columns. In the current version of the comparative tables, the list of parameters for comparison is quite limited, and it needs to be expanded. Please do not focus solely on the "control room layout"; we should have a broader comparison considering the "work environment" and "work organization." The "control room layout" is just one section within the broader category of the "Physical Environment."
Nour:
- I hope we clarified some uncertainties during the local meeting. It's unfortunate that there are no specific standards for "work organization" in "control rooms." Try further analyzing ISO 9241 and also look for ISA 101 and ISO 11064-10 on the internet.
- We have limited time left. Let's focus on the structure of the comparative table. We've discussed the sections; try to populate them. Also, coordinate your actions with Abdelrhman and delegate tasks to him, as we discussed in the meeting.
Group 2:
Sancia:
- did not present yet
- wating new results
Alaa:
- did not present yet
- wating new results
