Measurement of the electron beam profile by the multi-angle scanning method

31 Oct 2024, 15:50
15m
3-310 (MLIT)

3-310

MLIT

Oral Particle Accelerators and Nuclear Reactors Particle Accelerators and Nuclear Reactors

Speaker

Elizaveta Bushmina (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia)

Description

In the context of modern accelerator technology, it is essential to guarantee the specified characteristics of the extracted electron beam. In addition to the information regarding the energy and intensity of the beam, it is crucial to ascertain its spatial and angular distribution [1].
The position of the particle beam in space and its transverse intensity distribution can be determined by means of profilometry. The detectors of profilometers are of various types, dependent on the method employed for the acquisition of the profile. One such method is wire scanning. In order to implement the wire scanning method, it is proposed that a cylindrical ionization chamber can be used as the detecting element, with the detecting device moving linearly in a plane perpendicular to the beam propagation axis. This approach has been put forth due to the notable advantages of ionization chambers, including high radiation resistance, sensitivity to low-intensity radiation, ease of use, and the capacity to collect data in real time.
In order to obtain transverse distributions of the electron beam intensity, it was proposed that the multi-angle scanning method be used [2]. This method entails the rotational movement of the profilometer at different angles relative to the central axis of the beam. The data set obtained in this way represents the dependence of the beam profile on the scanning angle. Through the use of mathematical reconstruction methods, including the inverse Radon transform, the two-dimensional intensity distribution of the beam can be reconstructed.
As part of the study, a wire-scan profilometer utilizing an ionization chamber was developed and evaluated. In order to obtain transverse distributions of the electron beam intensity, a multi-angle scanning device was developed and tested. This included the profilometer described above, which provides linear movement of the detector, as well as a rotation system relative to the central axis of the beam. The prototype of the profilometer and the multi-angle scanning device were tested at the Microtron MT-25 facility (Dubna, Russian Federation) at an electron energy of 7 MeV.
The experimental studies conducted on the electron beam revealed that the ionization chamber is an effective tool for determining the position and measuring the size of the electron beam with high resolution (no worse than 1 mm). Transverse distributions of the electron beam intensity were obtained at varying distances from the microtron output window. The study demonstrated the efficacy of utilizing the ionization chamber in the capacity of a detector for both the profilometer and a multi-angle scanning device.
References:
1. Strehl, P. (2006). Beam instrumentation and diagnostics (Vol. 120). Berlin: Springer.
2. Grigorieva, A. A., Bulavskaya, A. A., Bushmina, E. A., Vorobiev, A. P., Vasilyeva, A. G., Miloichikova, I. A., & Stuchebrov, S. G. (2023). Using Multiangle Scanning to Determine the Transversal Profile of a Carbon Ion Beam. Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, 20(5), 1243-1245.

Primary authors

Angelina Bulavskaya (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia) Anton Baldin (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia) Elizaveta Bushmina (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia) Irina Miloichikova (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia; Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the RAS, Tomsk, Russia) Konstantin Timoshenko (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia) Pavel Karataev (John Adams Institute at Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom) Semen Mitrofanov (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia) Sergei Alexeev (Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia) Sergei Stuchebrov (Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.